Reviews:
The in-class reviews will consist of
multiple choice and a problems/essay section. Any valid excuse for missing a
review must be approved by me prior to the review--an approved excuse will
result in either a make-up review or a re-weighting of the other
requirements.
Homework Assignments:
A number of
assignments will be collected for grading. In order to receive credit for these
assignments, they must be handed in at the beginning of the class in which they
are due.
Oral Presentations:
Each student will be required
to present two antitrust case studies to the class. Each case corresponds to a
particular topic on the syllabus and so the presentations will occur at
different times throughout the last part of the semester. Cases will be assigned
randomly.
Short Papers/Essays:*
A number of essay topics will be assigned. They will require an independently
written 2 or 3 page response. No outside-of-class research will be
necessary for these assignments. The assigned readings and lecture notes will
suffice as sources.
Term Paper:*
The required research paper
will consist of a 20-25 page (exclusive of graphs, charts, etc.) industry
analysis. While it will be up to you to choose an industry of interest to you,
it must be approved by me. Conditions to be met include, but are not
limited to, established major industries with available firm-level performance
and industry-wide data. It must also be an industry that has an
interesting regulatory and/or antitrust history. Three
industry case studies will be considered in class during Part I of the course.
These studies may serve as models of what is expected of your research
paper.
Deadlines to be met:
March 18 - A 1-page industry proposal and source bibliography. Much of the data
you will need will be industry specific and not likely to be in Little Library.
(This assignment accounts for 5% of your paper grade.)
April 20 - A 3-5 page outline of the paper as well as an updated bibliography
(this bibliography should be restricted to sources which you have in hand and
are planning to use). (This assignment accounts for 10% of your paper grade.)
May 5: 4 PM, in my office. - The final paper.
* Specific paper specifications will be stipulated in a separate hand-out. It is
the responsibility of the student to adhere to all such
specifications.
Writing Course Designation:
As this course is
designated a Writing Course, the composition and presentation of all assignments
will be factors in grading. Take particular care that all written work is
carefully done and professionally presented.
Honor Code:
Strict compliance to the College’s
academic honesty and integrity policies will be adhered to throughout this
course.
Absences:
It is expected that all students will
make a concerted effort to attend all classes. The reviews and written
assignments will be based upon material presented in class which will include
subjects and examples not covered in the text. It is the responsibility of the
student to keep abreast of announcements made in class, and to obtain the class
notes from a fellow student.
Following is a proposed outline for the course --
it is subject to change. Additional 'readings' may be periodically handed out
during class or put on reserve in Little. It is the responsibility of the
student to keep up with any changes made to the course syllabus.
Industrial Organization Course
Syllabus
Part I: Theories of Firm Behavior
A. Introduction, Perfect Competition and Monopoly
Chapter 1 (excluding appendix) Perfect Competition
Case Study: “Agriculture”, by Daniel B. Suits, on Reserve
Chapter 2: Production Technology and Market Structure (include appendix)
Chapter 3: Basic Monopoly Pricing and Product Strategies
Dominant Firm Case Study: “ Computers,” by Neil Niman and Manley R. Irwin
Chapter 4: Pricing and Product Strategies For The Multi-Product
Monopolist
4.1 Product Variety and Price
Discrimination
4.2 A Spatial Approach to Product Variety
Review I: Thursday, 2/11/99
B. The Regulation of Natural
Monopolies
Natural Monopoly and Regulation: "Natural Monopoly" - Scherer, Chapter
11
C. Strategic Interdependence
Chapter 5: Theories of Business Strategy in Oligopoly Markets: Single Period
Models
Case study in Oligopoly: “Petroleum,” by Stephen Martin
Chapter 6: Monopoly Power and Predatory Conduct
Chapter 7: Collusion and Cartels
D. WISH LIST- Selected Topics
from:
Chapter 10: Advertising
Chapter 11: Research and Development
Chapter 12: Strategic Commitment
Review II: Thursday 3/25/99
Part II. Antitrust
A. The Antitrust Statutes
Chapter 1, Appendix Antitrust Casebook, Part I, The Essential Antitrust
Statutes
B. Horizontal Price Fixing and Market Division.
Antitrust Casebook., Part II;
Martin, Ch 6, pp 169-175. Naked vs. Ancillary
Price Fixing Cases: US vs. Addyston Pipe and Steel, p 14.
US vs Trenton Pottery, p 21.
Appalachian Coals v US, p 25.
Goldfarb vs Virginia State Bar, p 46.
Conscious Parallelism and Shared Monopoly Cases: Interstate Circuit vs. US p 78.
Theater Ent vs Paramount, p 83.
C. Mergers of Competitors, Actual and Potential
Chapter 8: Mergers, Horizontal, Vertical and Conglomerate
Antitrust Casebook, Part III. Cases:
Northern Securities Co vs the US, p 112.
Standard Oil of NJ vs US, p 120.
US vs. US Steel, p 128.
Brown Shoe vs US, p 133.
US v. Von’s Grocery, p 142.
D. Monopolization versus Monopoly
Antitrust Casebook., Part IV, Monopolization and the Dominant Firm. Cases:
US vs Alcoa, p 177.
US vs US Shoe, p 187.
Berkey Photo vs Eastman Kodak, p 202
Northeastern Telephone Co vs ATT Co.
Matsushita Electric et al vs Zenith, p 309.
E. Tying /Price Discrimination
Chapter 4: Pricing and Product Strategies For The Multi-Product Monopolist
Models
4.3 Tied Products and Price
Discrimination
4.4 Antitrust and Tie-In-Sales Price Discrimination Cases:
Brown and Williamson Tobacco, p 322.
FTC vs. Morton Salt, p 334.
Tying Cases:
Heny vs AB Dick, p 272.
International Salt Co. US vs Loew’s Inc., p 249.
Siegel et al vs Chicken Delight, p 252.
Eastman Kodak vs Image Services.
F. Exclusionary Practices and Vertical
Restraints
Chapter 9: Vertical Relations and Restraints Exclusionary Practices: Antitrust
Casebook, Part V. Cases: Brown Shoe ( 1962), p 227. Ford Motor
Company vs. US. p 230
Tampa Electric Co vs. Nashville Coal, 236.
Lorain Journal Co. vs US, p. 277
Aspen Skiing vs Aspen Highlands, p. 283
G. Vertical Price Fixing and Market Division
Antitrust Casebook, Part VI. Cases:
Dr. Miles Medical vs John Parke, p 359.
US vs. Colgate, p 362. Continental vs GTE Sylvania, p 377.