Last week, Kappa Alpha Order, a Greek-letter organization of which I
am a member, appealed to the Union Board, amongst other student organizations,
for monetary support for the KArnival, our annual philanthropic project
that benefits the Muscular Dystrophy Association. Despite the obvious
beneficence of the project and Kappa Alpha’s dedication to including the
entire campus in the community outreach event, the Union Board confronted
an ideological dilemma: Supporting this obviously well-planned, charitable
project would immediately link the Union to an organization with a reputation
for romanticizing the South and conservative ideas of masculinity as well
as plain bigotry and ignorance.
Because no consensus decision could be reached at that initial meeting,
the Union Board decided to invite the KAs to explain their request, but more
importantly to explain their position in relation to the national organization’s
rhetoric and history. The Sigma Chapter web site, which was designed and put
online almost three years ago, displayed a contextually racist quote from
Samuel Annas Zemmen, a journalist and Free Mason who helped revise Kappa Alpha
Order’s rituals and philosophy a decade after its founding in 1865. This piece
of writing stated something to the extent that one of Kappa Alpha’s aim was "the
preservation of the finest people of our race," refering implicitly to
the white race. While many Davidson KAs defy the stereotypes and have
no interest in preserving any constructed or romanticized Southern heritage,
this quote on the Davisdson KA home webpage contradicted any such claim.
James Jenkins, Corresponding Secretary of the chapter, responded to the
Union’s concerns by removing this quote, as well as other elements that
could be construed as offensive. On Monday, April 3, James, Craig Laws
and I presented these changes to the Union Board and engaged in a highly
productive dialogue. Satisfied with our presentation, the Union Board
was willing to grant us the nominal support and a donation of $500. I
should make it explicitly clear that the KArnvial was fully funded when
Kappa Alpha approached the Union Board.
There is another point that I should clarify before entering into my
personal thoughts on this matter. I’m quite a contradiction. Faces twist
when I say that I’m going down to KA for dinner. Of course we should never
expect people to keep open minds: a fabric of stereotypes usually suffices
for most of our worldviews. I relish my double life. My Patterson Court
affiliation and the intellectual / literary activism of Libertas each occupies
nearly equivalent parts of my personality. I present this as if a nest of
hillbillies in sheets is hiding in the basement of the KA house. I am sure that
at least one of my fraternity brothers associates with you every day. Some of them
are even in circumstances similar to my own. Does he fit your nice, neat
stereotype of racism? What I’m arguing here, however, are my own critiques
of Kappa Alpha Order and Sigma Chapter. I simply regret that it’s only
now that Sigma Chapter is willing to consider actively what it is part
of. But all change, for better or worse, requires catalysts and sometimes
slaps in the face.
For some time I have resigned myself to the knowledge that I am a member of
a wonderful Patterson Court house that happens to have a great deal more than last
week’s PCC violations appended to its name. Kappa Alpha Order does have an indelible
history of racism and chauvinism. Like many other fraternities founded during its
time period, it orignially consisted of former Confederate veterans. Similarily,
because much of KA's philosophy was appropriated from Masonic rhetoric, Ammen, and
other original members, early members were most likely disposed to certain biases
about class and gender. Critics should consider that the United States,
North Carolina, Davidson College, the Presbyterian Church and most other
institutions grounded in Western Humanism are as tainted as they are long.
Remember that Davidson College only became co-educational 1973. The first
black students to attend were African rather than African-American.
Yet I don’t feel that we’re at fault for our past. The wrong that we need
to right is what some might call our tradition and what I term our historical
residue: the old bigotry and racism have survived the generations and
are present in the artifacts and iconography with which we surround ourselves.
The KA cross, crest, and the portrait of Robert E. Lee can be perceived
as offensive. Personally, I identify these items as having some distance
from this history: they’re merely fantastic pastiche, decoration whose
real significance has been forgotten or at least misplaced. I can’t believe
that Robert E. Lee would appreciate that he’s construed by much of society
and certain members of KA as a representation of the evils of the Old
South. To indulge momentarily the misinterpretation of certain individual
KA chapters, I suspect that the fraternity’s ideology is probably rooted
in the same emotional and intellectual inertia that triggered the seccession
of the South from the Union: Romanticism. Lee is the ‘spiritual founder’
of KA not because he kept slaves at one point in his life, but because
he seems to project a code of ethics that resist industrial societry.
Lee’s ‘Definition of the Gentleman’ can be read as an expression of this
Romantic spirit. It is a code of courtesy and morality, suggesting the
gentleman is he who manages his privilege with discretion and to the benefit
of others. Lee's 'Definition,' too, is an artifact: just as a literary
work lacks transcendent value, its meaning is made and remade throughout
history. The ‘Definition of the Gentleman’ was not written as a discourse
of oppression, but society has changed in such a way that it’s easier
to find this code offensive than helpful. I’m more troubled with the issue
of privilege than gender. The possession of power over another human being,
a form of superiority, regardless of how delicately it is handled, is
not to be tolerated. This all sounds like the White Man’s Burden. I also
have a problem believing that every brother of Kappa Alpha would match
up to its demands.
The fraternity motto, too, is such an expression that is no longer
tolerable, for the same reason. Forty years ago, ‘God and Women’ meant
that the KA brother meant to serve Christianity and women. Again, echoes
of the Romantic poetry. God doesn’t have much bearing on Patterson Court
these days, and women can take care of themselves.
The most terrifying connection afforded by our name, motto and iconography
is to other chapters of KA, to our brothers who’ve managed to earn the
flak and label of racism. Judging from pictures on the websites maintained
by other chapters, the old Southern Gentlemans' tradition of dressing
up in Confederate officer uniforms and binding their dates in hoop skirts
is still in effect elsewhere. These images also seem to indicate that
extreme ideas of masculinity and fascination with hunting are healthy
values held by other Kappa Alphas. (See Beta Tau’s image titled ‘Guns.’)
All of this is misinterpreted Romanticism, yes, but it’s grossly misinterpreted!
So why bother at all? For those who are missing what I’m intimating, I’ll
dumb it down a little: When you’re in the bath tub with your little brother
Billy Joe, and Billy Joe shits in the water, do you politely ask him to
stop or do you run screaming for your mother?
So much of this problem is a result of KA being misperceived by members
of the campus community. No one in my fraternity joined KA in order to follow
the spiritual teachings of Robert E. Lee or satisfy their Romantic side. The
rhetoric and history of Kappa Alpha is something that pledges learn after
‘self-selecting’ into the fraternity. As a boy from Ohio, I had no idea that
KA had any racist connotations, although I’m sure that many of my brothers joined
to dress up in white robes and scare people studying during the week at
the BSC! In the fray of all this controversy it amazes me that members
of the community absolutely and hopelessly fail to see that we’re together
as friends not because we want to pretend to be Good Ol’ Boys, but because
we’re friends! We enjoy each others’ company. We play well together.
But we also refuse to discard or at least to denounce our affiliation with
other chapters and a national organization that permits MSU Kappa Alphas
to pay black children to pick up balls of cotton scattered outside the
house during Old South. So Davidson’s KA’s are not totally undeserving
of criticism. Now that we know that the bathwater is dirty, what will
we do? We’ve suddenly found ourselves assembling one of the largest charity
programs of any college organization and setting precedents with relationships
between Patterson Court and the Union. Personally, I have no need whatsoever
for Robert E. Lee and the anachronistic Kappa Alpha iconography. Of course,
I have friends, too, who, I hope, are equally interested in considering
our mutual condition.
Scott Geiger
|